Undoctrination.org

(Warning: Sexually Explicit Content)

Question: It is Election Day 2012. President Obama is running against a credible challenger, and you are a 50-year-old man who has just raped a 10-year-old boy. Whom will you vote for?

That question surely made you cringe, but if it made you angry, perhaps it’s because you suspect your political philosophy and your political party are about to be assailed unfairly. You’re bracing yourself for the cheap shots, and wondering how low your opposition will go. But let me ask you this: Why would you think that based simply on that question?  Perhaps there’s something troubling you deep down inside that you’ve chosen to ignore, and maybe it’s becoming more and more difficult to keep that ignorance alive. You sense a change taking place in your party, something untoward, something uncomfortable. You won’t admit it today, but sooner or later you’ll have no choice but to accept and defend it, or leave it—and your party affiliation—behind. That day draws near.

Back in 2000, Kevin Jennings, the founder and director of the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), celebrated his organization’s 10^th anniversary with a conference and workshop held at Tufts University in Massachusetts. When most of us think of a conference workshop, we think of something much different from what went on inside the classrooms at Tufts University that day. Mr. Jennings himself demonstrated to a room of 14-year-old boys the proper method of “fisting,” a disturbing and potentially dangerous gay sexual technique. Another instructor posed a question to his young audience: “Spit or swallow?” The children were asked to discuss whether or not it was rude to spit out a partner’s semen. Despite the uproar that followed the exposure of a recording of these incidents and a subsequent promise by Jennings that they’d tone it down in the future, at the following year’s conference Planned Parenthood handed out “fisting kits” to some 400 students, complete with graphic instructions. Jennings’ group also provided the students with a “black book,” which contained information not only on fisting, but also on “Water Sports” (pissing), “Rimming,” “F—ing,” and “Sucking.” In addition, the impressionable minors carried home a pamphlet with the names of local gay bars where they could expect to find some action (and apparently, admittance). Today, GLSEN provides school districts with lists of recommended reading material: one for children in grades K-6, another for grades 7-12, and a third list for teachers. Those recommended books are replete with obscene language and detailed descriptions of sexual encounters among children. Included in these publications is a book that favorably recounts the life of Harry Hay.

Kevin Jennings has given credit to Harry Hay for being the inspiration behind his decision to become a gay activist. Hay’s group, Mattachine, is recognized as the first gay rights organization in the world, and Hay as the first gay rights activist. Hay, who finally kicked off in 2002, was a staunch Marxist, Stalinist, and Satanist, a lifelong member of the Communist Party USA (which was controlled from Moscow during the Soviet era), and an active supporter of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). If you didn’t know, NAMBLA advocates for the legalization of sex between adults and boys as young as the age of eight. Hay was responsible for NAMBLA’s representation in gay pride parades around the country, as well as their admittance into the International Gay and Lesbian Association. He also called for a reparations suit against all heterosexuals for the “coercion” of children into a heterosexual lifestyle. A regular keynoter at NAMBLA conferences, Hay campaigned for the rights of pederasts and pedophiles to pursue their dreams of perversion. He worked within the framework of the Democratic Party as a member of Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition, through which he campaigned for Jackson’s election during the good reverend’s ill-fated presidential run. Upon his death, the New York Times, the L.A. Times, and many other liberal outlets published glowing reviews of the life and accomplishments of Harry Hay.

This leftist hero gave Kevin Jennings inspiration. And President Obama appointed Kevin Jennings as Safe School Czar. When responsible media began questioning Jennings’ history and trying to coax him into denouncing NAMBLA (which he wouldn’t do), the liberal press circled the lavender wagons. Media Matters, which is run by gay activist David Brock and funded by Democratic Party financier George Soros, was quick in their attempts to deflect and rebut any criticism of Jennings. Another Soros-funded organization, the Center for American Progress, followed suit. The National Lesbian Gay Journalist Association lauded Jennings and his praise of Harry Hay, and commended Media Matters for their active defense of Jennings.

It is a fair assumption that NAMBLA has a friend in Obama’s cabinet. At least one. They also have a friend in the ACLU. The left-wing legal giant, which sued the City of San Diego to force the Boy Scouts out of their lease on Balboa Park, is defending NAMBLA pro bono. Keep in mind that the ACLU has full discretion for whom and on which case they expend their funds, and in their infinitely-biased wisdom, they decided to punish the Boy Scouts for refusing to open the door for gay pedophiles to become scoutmasters. They chose, however, to defend the cabal of vile, criminal minds that is NAMBLA against a charge of complicity in the murder of a 10-year-old boy.

Cambridge resident Jeffery Curley was playing in his yard when he was lured away by two men. The men then strangled him to death, took the body to a New Hampshire apartment, sodomized the corpse, stuffed it in a cement-filled container, and dumped it into a river. Jeffrey’s parents proceeded to sue NAMBLA because of something one of the killers wrote in his diary—that he’d been afraid to approach little boys until he found that like-minded society of perverts. NAMBLA makes available to its members a rape-and-escape manual, which provides instructions on how to befriend the parents of target children, how to lure those children, how to rape them, and how to cover any tracks. They take it a step further by making suggestions on what to do if caught. It’s not possible to imagine how Jeffrey’s parents must feel about the ACLU. The merits of the case aside, the liberal ACLU did not have to take it on. So why did they?

In 2007, Charles Rust-Tierney, former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU, was convicted of having downloaded and collected child pornography for a period of several years. The jury in his trial was presented with material in which a little girl could be heard screaming, and another seen bound by ropes. Many examples were presented of pre-pubescent children being forcibly penetrated. It should be noted that Rust-Tierney had been a coach for several children’s sports teams and had been active in arguing against restrictions on public-library computers. This is the type of situation the ACLU claims the Boy Scouts have no right to head off.

This may not be conclusive proof of a pervading culture of child-love in the ACLU, but it is part of an emerging pattern on the political left that ACLU behavior reinforces. Liberal judges continue to make news by bestowing outrageous leniency on child molesters. In one instance, the former mayor of Racine, Wisconsin, Gary Becker, was convicted of child enticement and attempted sexual assault on a child. He faced a sentence of 27 years, but leftist Judge Stephen Simanek gave him only three. The judge said he would’ve awarded probation had the convict not bought a pair of girls’ panties just before sentencing. In example after example, leftist judges have sentenced child molesters to far less than the minimum sentence, or have given the perverts early release, only to see them in court again, and often after they’ve murdered a victim. And speaking of pedophiles and elected positions, one case of note involves liberal Tim Russo and his run for a city post in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Russo had once been convicted on felony child-molestation charges, which was all well and good for Howie Klein of the left-wing Huffington Post. Klein stepped up to the plate on Russo’s behalf, lamenting in a column that the local media wanted to “make him pay for the rest of his life,” before he went on to minimize and explain away Russo’s criminal indiscretions. Anecdotal evidence to be sure, but sexual predators know very well from which direction support is likely to come.

So is Obama part of a leftist scheme, trying to do his part in mainstreaming the acceptance of criminal perversion? What, we have to wonder, was going through his mind when he chose to appoint a man like Kevin Jennings as Safe School Czar? Was that choice the result of Obama’s personal animus against the sexualization of children? Was it a statement against child molestation? That would make the opposite of sense. But there must have been a reason. Consider the following excerpts taken from a book published in 1968:

“Under certain circumstances I am bisexual… a voyeur and an exhibitionist…occasionally mildly interested in sado-masochism. I have often wished I had two penises to enjoy simultaneously the double – but different – sensations of oral and genital copulation.” And then this from another chapter describing the author and his wife’s joint seduction of a 13-year-old girl named Ann:  “I’m not one to go in for Lolitas. Usually I’d rather not bed a babe under 20. But there are exceptions. I didn’t want to disappoint the trusting child. At her still-impressionistic (sic) age, a rejection might be traumatic, could even cripple her sexually for life.” And he continues: “Anne came up many times the next several weeks, her aunt thinking she was in good hands. Actually she was. She obtained a course in practical sex from experienced and considerate practitioners rather than from ignorant insensitive neophytes…I think we did her a favor, although the pleasure was mutual.” The author went on to admit that he derived gratification from being pissed on and flogged, as well as from bondage and simulated rape. He explained that he regretted none of it, as to him it was all normal behavior.

So who is this writer, and what does it have to do with anything? He was another member of the Communist Party USA. His name was Frank Marshall Davis, and he was Obama’s mentor when Obama was a teenager. Just how much time they spent together during Obama’s teenage years, we’ll never know. Anyone who could’ve told us, save one, is dead, and that one is Barak Obama. All we know for sure is that Obama’s communist mentor was an admitted child molester and a bisexual—and that he and Obama’s grandfather used to take little Barry to whore houses. His influence on the thinking of young Barak was undoubtedly substantial. Even with Davis’s documented involvement in the Communist Party, Obama was compelled to mention him in a spirit of admiration in his first autobiography—the one that communist terrorist Bill Ayers admitted to ghost writing.  (It is an interesting coincidence, too, that Ann was Obama’s mother’s name.)

It defies logic: there is no publicly-acceptable explanation for appointing a man like Kevin Jennings to any cabinet position, much less that of Safe School Czar. If there is an explanation of a psychological nature, we will never learn it, but psychology was surely involved. As we can see, communist ideology is popular with the child-love crowd, and so is the Democratic Party. This perverted mindset is not fading in liberal political circles; it is growing, and certainly growing more noticeable. The parents of students in the Helena, Montana, school system can tell you all about liberal machinations to sexualize their kindergarteners. Attempts to hide this type of perversion are being afforded less and less effort. Instead, attempts to question it are being shut down by George Soros and Democrat organs like Media Matters and the Center for American Progress. Let us not forget, too, that the criminal organization to which Obama promised in a speech a voice in his government, ACORN, was caught several times agreeing to accommodate the prostitution of underage girls.

You Democratic functionaries who might be mortified over the inevitable dénouement of this party transformation had better speak out and soon. There are fewer and fewer of you left. This madness is making leaps and bounds toward normalcy; felonious deviancy is finding its place in the leftist mainstream. Maybe this isn’t what you signed up for. Maybe it has crept up on you without your notice; but then again, maybe they’ve always wanted it that way—maybe they know you’re not one of them. One day, you’ll catch a colleague downloading child porn and find yourself being brushed off when you try to bring it to the attention of your party superiors. You’ll struggle with the decision to go to the authorities. You’ll be alone. If you have any questions as to how pervasive this insanity is in your sphere, you could ask your former House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. She’s the prominent Democrat who once marched smiling and waving right behind Harry Hay in the San Francisco Gay Pride Parade.